Obama’s War On Global Poverty; Grandma Lives in Hut

H/T:  Atlas Shrugs

Obama is very sensitive to Global Poverty; and this is proven amply by his Senate Bill S. 2433   which proposes to levy tax in the United States as determined by the United Nations.  This tax will only cost Americans approximately $1 Trillion over the next few years; but you are rich, decadent capitalists, and you can easily afford it, recession or no.

Obama is so sensitive to Global Poverty, that he forgot his grandma, living in a mud hut in Kenya - as he relaxed in his largely donated   (by accused grafter and Obama financier Antoin Rezko)  mansion in Hyde Park.

 Obama Head

I hope that Obama is never in charge of taking care of my grandmother; or your grandmother. 

Article, including photo, lifted entirely and shamelessly from Bob McCarty

  ..Why is ‘Grandma Obama’ Still Living in a Hut?

December 29th, 2007 · 5 Comments

Speaking before a crowd of would-be voters in Coralville, Iowa, yesterday, Democrat presidential candidate Barack Obama said the following, according to ABC News Political Radar:

“It’s that experience, that understanding, not just of what world leaders I went and talked to in the ambassadors house I had tea with, but understanding the lives of the people like my grandmother who lives in a tiny hut in Africa.”

While some characterized it as a veiled shot at arch rival Hillary Clinton and her claims of presidential-level experience, I viewed it differently. Obama’s statement prompted me to wonder why “Grandma Obama” is still living in a tiny hut years after her nouveaux-riche grandson had attained the means via which he could have greatly improved her living situation.

Just a thought from Bob McCarty Writes.

Obama’s Conscience Speaks

Obama and Racist

Obama and Spiritual Leader

Perhaps “raged” better captures the moment, in Obama Minister Exudes Hatred .  Obama’s moral “sounding board” was almost as full of anti-American rage, at Howard University in January of 2006, as even Obama’s Marxist, anti-Western family in Kenya.  Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr. is not high on America.  He sounds a lot like Obama’s wife Michelle.  Is anybody detecting a pattern yet?  William Ayers, Raila Amolo Odinga, Abongo “Roy” Obama, Stanley Ann Dunham, Wright, Rezko, Nadhmi Auchi, Bernardine Dohrn, Michelle, Farrakhan, Rashid Khalidi, Frank Marshall Davis . . . Search any name with “Obama.”  Does Obama have a friend, relative, contributor or associate who is not either a terrorist, anti-Semite, Marxist, or criminal (or all of the above?).  How does Obama find time to associate with ANYBODY who is not sick of America?

Saviour Obama Shall Transform You!

In the Name of Allah, it’s Saviours’ Day in Chicago:

Savior Barak

And, Barack (an Arabic name, incidentally (see Feb. 26 entry), that means “blessing”),  Hussein Obama is the Super-Star!

What you need is to be “transformed,” and Barack (Arabic) Hussein (Arabic) Obama (Luo) is just the “Savior” to do it.

Farrakhan’s expertise?  Fairly monolithic:  the renewed fascism of Arabia, and Jew-hating.  Obama is his Savior; and “saving” to Farrakhan translates roughly as “killing jews.”

It is so reassuring that our leading Democrat contender for President of the United States, whose wife is  embarrassed   to be an American, has such wonderful friends, too.

CHICAGO http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jsH788z7q8_B5BpcOtdkCK0IwN5wD8V13IMO1   - In his first major public address since a cancer crisis, Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan said Sunday that presidential candidate Barack Obama is the “hope of the entire world” that the U.S. will change for the better.

The 74-year-old Farrakhan, addressing an estimated crowd of 20,000 people at the annual Saviours’ Day celebration, never outrightly endorsed Obama but spent most of the nearly two-hour speech praising the Illinois senator.

“This young man is the hope of the entire world that America will change and be made better,” he said. “This young man is capturing audiences of black and brown and red and yellow. If you look at Barack Obama’s audiences and look at the effect of his words, those people are being transformed.”

Europe Consensus Builds on Obama “Lack Of Substance”

UK Times On Line notes the true significance of Michelle’s naive but candid  revelation (here,     here)  of her lack of pride in her country (as the wife of  US Senator); also UK Times On Line finds the Obama patform seriously lacking of substance.  Shades of Walter Mondale, with ”messianic” icing!

UK Times On Line

Obama: is America ready for this dangerous leftwinger?

Listen to the rhetoric of Barack Obama …

But not, apparently, Michelle Obama, wife of the man who is now the putative Democratic candidate for US president, and at this point favourite to succeed to that job. In what might be the most revealing statement made by any political figure so far in this campaign season, Mrs Obama caused a stir this week. She said that the success of her husband Barack’s campaign had marked the first time in her adult life that she had felt pride in her country.

This, even by the astonishingly self-absorbed standards of politicians and their families, is a remarkably narrow view of what makes a country great. And though she later half-heartedly tried to retract the remark it was a statement pregnant with meaning for the presidential election campaign.

. . .

Secondly, and more importantly, I suspect it reveals much about what the Obama family really thinks about the kind of nation that America is.

more . . .

While he speaks of the need for Americans to move beyond partisanship (“We are not blue states or red states, but the United States” is a campaign meme), when you cut through the verbiage there is nothing to suggest he believes anything that is seriously at odds with the far Left of his party. If you think about it for a second, it’s not really an accident that he has been endorsed by the likes of Ted Kennedy and Jesse Jackson.

Though he talks with great eloquence about the future, he sounds for all the world like one of the long line of Democrats from George McGovern to Walter Mondale to Michael Dukakis, who became history by espousing policies and striking a rhetorical pose that was well out of the mainstream of American politics.

Thanks to: Don Surber Foreign press warnings on Obama

Der Spiegel Examines Obama “Change”

Obama Talks Lunacy 

Photo: Obama outlines plan to invade Pakistan

Lunacy?  That’s how Der Spiegel describes Obama’s plan to invade Pakistan!

YES - That is Obama’s stated plan.  Maybe he can fix Pakistan up, as he did Kenya.   Obama Gets Things Rolling In Kenya

Read the whole thing!

Change You Can’t Believe In

By Gabor Steingart in Washington

The rise of democratic frontrunner Barack Obama signifies an alarming victory of style over substance. Not unlike the dot-com hype, his campaign promises more than he can deliver. The one thing his voters can count on is that they will ultimately be disappointed.

-and this -

In fact, Obama’s most dangerous land mines are hidden in foreign policy. A quick withdrawal from Iraq? Sounds great. But the mistake of having started this war in the first place cannot be corrected by ending it in a mad rush to get out of Iraq. A rapid withdrawal of the US military would most likely be followed by a bloody civil war. Al-Qaida would manage to sink its teeth into Iraq once and for all. Iran would rejoice. And Osama bin Laden and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would be the real winners of the 2008 American presidential election.

On top of all that, Obama, in an effort to show strength, has come up with a new, and in some ways exclusive, theater for the US armed forces. He talks about military operations in the nuclear power Pakistan, operations that he, as commander-in-chief, would order even without the approval of the United Nations. That is “the war we need to win,” he says again and again.

But in reality a military campaign in Pakistan would be lunacy, even if many in the American media have chosen to studiously ignore Obama’s comments. A comparison with President John F. Kennedy, who was 43 when he was elected, reveals that Kennedy was in fact unenthusiastic about going to war in Vietnam. It was a war the inexperienced President slid into, and if he was a war president, it was by accident and not design.

Thanks to: Don Surber Foreign press warnings on Obama

Wife of US Senator Disavows Pride in America

The Divider

This prospective First Lady wants you to know - America SUCKS, from her point of view.

America provides her only “frustration and disappointment,” as the wife of a United States Senator.

What a wonderful First Lady she will make!  

  

The Divider  

By Jacob Laksin
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, February 21, 2008

——

It was a jarring statement. Did the candidate’s wife really mean to suggest that the country had been hopeless until her husband emerged as the Democratic frontrunner? Indeed she did, and just a few hours later, she reiterated the point in nearly identical terms. “For the first time in my adult lifetime, I’m really proud of my country — not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change. I have been desperate to see our country moving in that direction and just not feeling so alone in my frustration and disappointment.” There was no mistaking her message: Until it found the wisdom to rally around her husband, America had been a source of constant disappointment for Mrs. Obama.

When her remarks justifiably aroused outrage, the unenviable task of explaining them away fell to the senator himself. On the one hand, Obama said, his wife’s words had been taken “out of context.” But at the same time, Sen. Obama continued, “she’s pretty cynical about the political process, and with good reason, and she’s not alone.” And sure enough, it was this cynicism that landed her in trouble in the first place.

Yet it’s hard to see what Michelle Obama has to be cynical about. Though it is true that she was born on the South Side of Chicago, there is no shortage of Americans who start from humble beginnings. The difference is that, unlike many, Michelle Obama is also a child of privilege. In a recent interview with Newsweek, Obama reveals that she got into Princeton University not on the strength of her grades, which she admits were unexceptional, but thanks to her brother Craig, a star athlete and gifted student who preceded her to the school. As a “legacy” candidate and a beneficiary of affirmative action, Michelle Obama was granted an opportunity that others more accomplished were denied. Nor, according to friends quoted in the article, did Obama object when she was later accepted to Harvard as part of the school’s outreach to minority students. “She recognized that she had been privileged by affirmative action and she was very comfortable with that,” her friend recalls.

Comfortable, perhaps, but certainly not content. A more humble personality might have appreciated the unearned advantages she had been afforded. Michelle Obama seems instead to have developed an abiding sense of racial resentment. This resentment finds its most bitter expression in her 1985 Princeton senior thesis, conveniently blocked from public viewing by the school until after next year’s presidential election, titled “Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community.” In it, the young Michelle LaVaughn Robinson paints a grim portrait of her future prospects, warning against “further integration and/or assimilation into a White cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant.” Regardless of the opportunities that had been offered her, Obama continued to see herself as a victim of a racist white society, trapped in the divide that her husband’s campaign now seeks to breech.  

(Whole article here)

Balcony Incident?

Now, what can you imagine is a “balcony incident?”

Apparently “balcony incident” is an horrific abuse of language; just as the crime it refers to is a horrific abuse against humanity.

How many such murders are we talking about?

Three cases, in the last year, in Sweden alone

Gates Of Vienna

Friday, February 08, 2008

What Kind of Pigs? by Baron Bodissey

The balcony at the apartment buildingI posted the other day about the rash of “balcony incidents” in Sweden, a series of suspicious deaths of young girls who fall or are pushed from apartment balconies. Most of these deaths are assumed to be honor killings.

The most recent incident was in Malmö; Esther at Islam in Europe has written extensively on this topic. Our Swedish correspondent LN pointed us to this interesting new twist in the case, from an article in the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet. A letter purporting to be from a witness to the murder was found at the scene of the killing. Our Danish correspondent TB has kindly translated the text of the letter, and also the article about it.

Note: This is a Swedish story which was covered by a Norwegian newspaper, brought to our attention by a Swede, and translated by a Dane. That’s Multiculturalism, Gates of Vienna style.

Some Reports of WMDS! Information (about non-existent?) WMDs SO CRITICAL . . .

Ten years in prison - for plotting to give information about supposedly non-existent Iraq WMDs to terrorists?

The documentation referred to below is about supposedly non-existent WMDs; and “The information is so critical . . .”

(Like CIA, Hussein’s General Georges Sada also knows about the WMDs in Iraq.  Except, General Sada has told us about them.)

Our CIA will merrily let detailed news of Iraqi WMDs out to insurgents/international terrorists; just not to Americans. Why?

It is the CIA that needs the 10 years in prison - preferrably a Morrocan prison; or maybe a Turkish one. Make it 50 years. The whole stinking outfit.

Mystery Deepens Over WMD Documents 

By JOSEPH GOLDSTEIN
Staff Reporter of the Sun
February 6, 2008

 Iraq, which named the coordinates of where the Army suspected weapons of mass destruction to be hidden, ended up in an Arabic translator’s apartment on Hoyt Street in Brooklyn, is clear.Not likely to be known anytime soon is what, if anything, the army contractor did with the documents.The U.S. attorney’s office in Brooklyn, which is prosecuting the case, appears to have little direct evidence that Noureddine Malki passed information on to the insurgency, either during his time in Iraq in 2003 and 2004, or upon his return to America in 2005. But it has raised the possibility that he may have done so. The government has said Malki regularly called phone numbers connected to insurgents and took bribes of at least $11,500 from Sunni tribal leaders. The government, prosecutors wrote in one court filing, could “establish that the defendant had an opportunity to provide stolen classified information to anti-coalition forces.”Yesterday, at a hearing in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn, an Army officer with the 82nd Airborne Division described some of the reports that Malki had obtained. “The information is so critical that you do not want the information to get into the hands of anyone without the need to know,” Lieutenant Colonel Michele Bredenkamp said, referring to a mission analysis report for the 82nd Airborne, to which Malki was attached. The document, among other things, described convoy routes and named known terrorists the Army was targeting. Between 60 and 70 individuals had authorization to view the document, which could be accessed through a secure computer, Colonel Bredenkamp testified.“Would this be the type of thing for a soldier to take for a keepsake?” a prosecutor, John Buretta, asked.“That’s absurd,” Colonel Bredenkamp said.

Malki has pleaded guilty to charges of unauthorized possession of national defense information. He is likely to be sentenced this spring. Prosecutors are seeking a 10-year sentence. Malki’s lawyer, Mildred Whalen, is calling for him to be released on time served.

In court papers, Ms. Whalen has claimed that documents Malki “had in his possession were obtained or kept unknowingly.”

n a short phone interview from prison last year, Malki told The New York Sun: “I never had bad intentions whatsoever.”

“I loved this country more than them,” he added, though it was not entirely clear to whom he referred. “I served this country in Iraq and they didn’t.”

Malki, a native of Morocco, immigrated to Brooklyn in 1989, his sister, Sonia Malki, said in an interview. While two of his siblings earlier moved to France, Malki decided to set out for America, after living in Paris for three months in 1989.

“This is not a terrorism case,” Ms. Malki said. “This could happen to any immigrant.”

Malki did not initially land on his feet in this county. He was homeless for a time. At one point he drove for a car service. A passenger robbed him, hitting his head so hard that he fell into a coma, Ms. Malki recalled.

Ms. Malki, who lives in France, said her brother went to Iraq as a translator out of gratitude to America, which gave him citizenship in 2000.

“In the end he has done a good job for this country,” she said.